It is a constitutional cliché that the house of lords exercises only a revising power, and that the legislating power resides in the house of commons alone but all this has now changed, for clichés are weak. As calls to abolish the house of lords intensify we find out just what you think should happen most of you are furious prime minister david cameron is set to appoint another 50 lords to the . Labour should completely reject the coalition's proposals the house of lords is a medieval relic from a time when land ownership was a major source of political power, and just as ownership of land moved from generation to generation so did the titles.
The house of lords could be something great if governments weren't too afraid or selfish to change it for the better abolishing the house would give governments too much power and we would most certainly run the risk of an oppressive - even a totalitarian-like - government real reform could deliver real results. The house of lords would remain subject to the pre-eminence of the house of commons in discharging its functions its principal function should continue to be to consider and revise legislation, to scrutinise the executive, and to debate and report on public issues. Like the lower house, the upper house should better reflect the country it represents the house of lords’ fundamental challenge, however, will always be that it is an institution moulded over the courses of distant ages.
The guardian - back to home members of the house of lords await the state opening of parliament in may 2015 one poll found that over 70% agreed the lords should be largely elected to . “as the house of lords has existed for about six centuries without reform, some alterations have become necessary in order to bring it into conformity with the changed institutions by which it is surrounded”. With yet another embarrassing social blunder by one of the uk’s parliamentarians, lord sewel has now resigned from the house of lords after he was covertly filmed allegedly sniffing cocaine using a £5 note with prostitutes. The house of lords should be dissolved and replaced by an elected second house consisting of a selection of people on non-party lines the house of lords has no right to defy the will of the people and the commons on this brexit amendment.
Lord david steel and baroness helena kennedy debate the idea of an elected house of lords photograph: david levene t his week a poll of peers revealed overwhelming opposition to nick clegg's proposals to reform the house of lords. House of the lords reform has been debated and argued over for more than a century but on wednesday in a debate at westminster, the snp will call for its abo. Should the house of lords be replaced by an elected second chamber, perhaps elected through a proportional representation system this is a more complicated question bi-cameral systems such as in the usa can be slower and less efficient that uni-cameral ones, on the other hand they may be more cautious and less prone to be swayed by party .
The house of lords should be abolished and replaced with a popular peoples movement a house of community debate for community concerns and the approval of legislation by subject specialization there is very little debate by the community in the uk may has proven herself to be even worse than cameron by putting forward an agenda that we the people have had little part in evolving. Yes the house of lords is the uk’s unelected second chamber before any legislation can become law in the uk it must be approved by the lords, even if it has already been passed by the house of commons. The conservative government has threatened to abolish the house of lords if it blocks theresa may’s controversial brexit bill a government source told the bbc that the lords could “face an . Two members of the house of lords have joined calls for the upper house to be made smaller then the house of commons conservative peer lord norton and crossbench peer baroness deech said it .
In the wake of the government’s historic tax credits defeat in the house of lords last week, a few questions have been raised in regards to the upper chamber of parliament in addition to their . Just 12% of brits think the house of lords should carry on without massive reform, a damning survey reveals a survation poll for the daily mirror found overwhelming support for a root-and-branch . In the late 1940s, fearing that the lords would hold up or halt the post-war government's nationalisation programme, the labour government used the parliament act 1911's powers to override the house of lords to amend the parliament act 1911, giving them more power to circumvent the house of lords in passing bills. The house of lords is seen by some as an antiquated addition to our government structure, a mockery of modern democracy and an inhibiting influence in the drive for progress.
It is not often that a member of the house of lords does something worthy of massive media attention and when they do, it is not usually for a good reason and so it is with the man dubbed lord . So we asked: should the house of lords be 100 per cent democratically elected to share your views you can vote in our poll, leave comments below or go over to our facebook and twitter pages.
Two recent events have brought back into prominence that hardy perennial house of lords reform the first event was former prime minister david cameron’s disastrous resignation honours list. Should we have an elected house of lords is an elected house of lords the best way to reform the upper chamber helena kennedy believes the principle is sound, but david steel thinks it just . The house of lords has come under renewed scrutiny this week, following the resignation of lord sewel over drug and prostitution allegations and reports that a secret reform panel has been set up eight reasons the house of lords should be reformed immediately | indy100.